Free AI platform comparison

Claude (Anthropic) vs Groq: Complete Comparison

Claude (Anthropic) 和 Groq 深度对比：免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、中国大陆可用性，帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

Claude (Anthropic) vs Groq: Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose Claude (Anthropic) if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Groq if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierClaude (Anthropic): Limited messages/day · Groq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)

Free APINo vs Free tier（永久免费）

Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction

DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters

Claude (Anthropic) detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Groq detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Free AI API directoryCompare all free credits and limits

Claude (Anthropic)

35pts

0 wins

👑

Groq

80pts

2 wins

🏆 Overall, Groq offers more free value (2/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

Claude (Anthropic)1 models

Claude Sonnet 4.6

📐 200k⚡ Rate limited

Available to free users, excellent at coding; May 2026 status signals show the Sonnet 4.6 generation is active

Groq6 models

Llama 3.3 70B Versatile

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated

Llama 4 Scout 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use

Llama 4 Maverick 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use

Mixtral 8x7B

📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM

MoE architecture, cost-effective

Gemma 2 9B

📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM

Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Claude (Anthropic) if…

you want Limited messages/day on the free tier.

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier（永久免费） for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, Claude (Anthropic) or Groq?

Groq scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does Claude (Anthropic) have a free tier?

Yes. Claude (Anthropic) lists Limited messages/day for free users.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

Claude (Anthropic) has no clearly listed free API credits; Groq offers Free tier（永久免费）. Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug: claude-vs-groq
Claude (Anthropic) source: https://claude.ai
Groq source: https://groq.com
Dataset freshness: Claude (Anthropic): 2026-06-15 · Groq: 2026-06-15
Decision data: Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

View Claude (Anthropic) →View Groq →

Claude (Anthropic) vs Groq: Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Claude (Anthropic)

Groq

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Claude (Anthropic) if…

Choose Groq if…

FAQ

Source snapshot

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit