Free AI platform comparison

Coze (ByteDance) vs Qwen (Alibaba): Complete Comparison

扣子 (字节跳动) 和通义千问 (阿里) 深度对比：免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、国内可用性，帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

Coze (ByteDance) vs Qwen (Alibaba): Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose Coze (ByteDance) if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Qwen (Alibaba) if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierCoze (ByteDance): No explicit limit · Qwen (Alibaba): 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model

Free APIFree tier vs 7000 万 tokens（新用户一次性；DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准）

Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction

DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters

Coze (ByteDance) detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Qwen (Alibaba) detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Free AI API directoryCompare all free credits and limits

Coze (ByteDance)

60pts

0 wins

👑

Qwen (Alibaba)

95pts

3 wins

🏆 Overall, Qwen (Alibaba) offers more free value (3/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

Coze (ByteDance)1 models

多模型可选

📐 128k⚡ Fair use

Access to Doubao, GPT-4o and other models

Qwen (Alibaba)4 models

Qwen3.6-Plus

📐 1000k⚡ Quota and RPM/TPM vary by account

Latest flagship, strong long-context/coding model; verify free-credit coverage, RPM, TPM, and availability in the DashScope console

Qwen3.6-27B

📐 262k (1M extended)⚡ Local/open-source or hosted quota

27B dense open model for local deployment; hosted API quota and free-credit coverage depend on the account tier

Qwen-Max

📐 32k⚡ Higher-cost paid model; quota varies

Alibaba general model; confirm free-credit coverage and output pricing before heavy use

Qwen-VL

📐 32k⚡ Multimodal quota varies

Multimodal model; image/OCR usage may consume different quota than text calls

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Coze (ByteDance) if…

you want No explicit limit on the free tier, plus Free tier for API tests.

Choose Qwen (Alibaba) if…

you want 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model on the free tier, plus 7000 万 tokens（新用户一次性；DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准） for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, Coze (ByteDance) or Qwen (Alibaba)?

Qwen (Alibaba) scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does Coze (ByteDance) have a free tier?

Yes. Coze (ByteDance) lists No explicit limit for free users.

Does Qwen (Alibaba) have a free tier?

Yes. Qwen (Alibaba) lists 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

Coze (ByteDance) offers Free tier; Qwen (Alibaba) offers 7000 万 tokens（新用户一次性；DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准）. Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug: coze-vs-qwen
Coze (ByteDance) source: https://www.coze.cn
Qwen (Alibaba) source: https://tongyi.aliyun.com
Dataset freshness: Coze (ByteDance): 2026-06-05 · Qwen (Alibaba): 2026-06-05
Decision data: Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

View Coze (ByteDance) →View Qwen (Alibaba) →