Free AI platform comparison

DeepSeek vs Groq: China vs US Free AI Showdown

DeepSeek 和 Groq 深度对比：中国 vs 美国免费 AI 平台，模型能力、推理速度、国内可用性、开源程度全面 PK

Quick decision

DeepSeek vs Groq: China vs US Free AI Showdown: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose DeepSeek if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Groq if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierDeepSeek: 50 requests/day · Groq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)

Free API$5 vs Free tier（永久免费）

Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction

DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters

DeepSeek detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Groq detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Free AI API directoryCompare all free credits and limits

👑

DeepSeek

95pts

1 wins

Groq

80pts

1 wins

🏆 Overall, DeepSeek offers more free value (1/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

DeepSeek4 models

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

📐 1000k⚡ Rate limited

Released April 2026, 1.6T param MoE (49B active), 1M context, thinking/non-thinking modes

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

📐 1000k⚡ Rate limited

Lightweight V4, 284B params (13B active), 1M context, excellent value

DeepSeek-V3

📐 64k⚡ 50 RPD

Previous flagship, still available

DeepSeek-R1

📐 64k⚡ 50 RPD

Reasoning model, strong at math/code

Groq6 models

Llama 3.3 70B Versatile

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated

Llama 4 Scout 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use

Llama 4 Maverick 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use

Mixtral 8x7B

📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM

MoE architecture, cost-effective

Gemma 2 9B

📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM

Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek if…

you want 50 requests/day on the free tier, plus $5 for API tests.

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier（永久免费） for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, DeepSeek or Groq?

DeepSeek scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does DeepSeek have a free tier?

Yes. DeepSeek lists 50 requests/day for free users.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

DeepSeek offers $5; Groq offers Free tier（永久免费）. Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug: deepseek-vs-groq
DeepSeek source: https://platform.deepseek.com
Groq source: https://groq.com
Dataset freshness: DeepSeek: 2026-06-05 · Groq: 2026-06-05
Decision data: Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

View DeepSeek →View Groq →

DeepSeek vs Groq: China vs US Free AI Showdown: pricing, free API, and limits

DeepSeek

Groq

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek if…

Choose Groq if…

FAQ

Source snapshot

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit