Free AI platform comparison

Doubao (ByteDance) vs Groq: Complete Comparison

豆包 (字节跳动) 和 Groq 深度对比:免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、中国大陆可用性,帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

Doubao (ByteDance) vs Groq: Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose Doubao (ByteDance) if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Groq if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierDoubao (ByteDance): No explicit limit · Groq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)
Free API50万 tokens vs Free tier(永久免费)
Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction
DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters
Doubao (ByteDance)

Doubao (ByteDance)

75pts
0 wins
VS
👑Groq

Groq

80pts
1 wins

🏆 Overall, Groq offers more free value (1/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

Category
Doubao (ByteDance)
Groq
Free Tier
✅ No explicit limit
✅ 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)
Free API
✅ 50万 tokens
✅ Free tier(永久免费)
Rate Limit
5 RPM
30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Open Source
❌ No
❌ No
Free Models
4
6
GitHub Stars
-
-

🧠 Model Details

Doubao (ByteDance)4 models
Seed 2.0 Pro
📐 128k⚡ Fair use
Flagship all-rounder, close to DeepSeek V3
Seed 2.0 Code
📐 128k⚡ Fair use
Coding-focused, surpasses DeepSeek V3 in coding
Seed 2.0 Mini
📐 128k⚡ Fair use
Ultra-fast and cheap, ¥0.3/M tokens, almost free
Seed 2.0 Lite
📐 128k⚡ Fair use
Balanced version, good value
Groq6 models
Llama 3.3 70B Versatile
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated
Llama 4 Scout 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use
Mixtral 8x7B
📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM
MoE architecture, cost-effective
Gemma 2 9B
📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM
Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Doubao (ByteDance) if…

you want No explicit limit on the free tier, plus 50万 tokens for API tests.

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier(永久免费) for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, Doubao (ByteDance) or Groq?

Groq scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does Doubao (ByteDance) have a free tier?

Yes. Doubao (ByteDance) lists No explicit limit for free users.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

Doubao (ByteDance) offers 50万 tokens; Groq offers Free tier(永久免费). Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug
doubao-vs-groq
Doubao (ByteDance) source
https://www.doubao.com
Groq source
https://groq.com
Dataset freshness
Doubao (ByteDance): 2026-06-15 · Groq: 2026-06-15
Decision data
Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

🎁 Free Resource Pack

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit

Free API credits list, AI business case studies, payment stack, risk checklist, and a monetization roadmap.

Get it free →
🐑 AI Assistant