Free AI platform comparison

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) vs Groq: Complete Comparison

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) 和 Groq 深度对比:免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、中国大陆可用性,帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) vs Groq: Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose FLUX (Black Forest Labs) if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Groq if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierFLUX (Black Forest Labs): Free via third-party platforms · Groq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)
Free APIFree via platforms vs Free tier(永久免费)
Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction
DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters
👑FLUX (Black Forest Labs)

FLUX (Black Forest Labs)

85pts
1 wins
VS
Groq

Groq

80pts
1 wins

🏆 Overall, FLUX (Black Forest Labs) offers more free value (1/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

Category
FLUX (Black Forest Labs)
Groq
Free Tier
✅ Free via third-party platforms
✅ 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)
Free API
✅ Free via platforms
✅ Free tier(永久免费)
Rate Limit
Varies
30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Open Source
✅ Yes
❌ No
Free Models
2
6
GitHub Stars
-
-

🧠 Model Details

FLUX (Black Forest Labs)2 models
FLUX.1 [schnell]
📐 N/A⚡ Varies
Open-source fast version, can run locally
FLUX.1 [dev]
📐 N/A⚡ Varies
Open-source dev version, higher quality
Groq6 models
Llama 3.3 70B Versatile
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated
Llama 4 Scout 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use
Mixtral 8x7B
📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM
MoE architecture, cost-effective
Gemma 2 9B
📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM
Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose FLUX (Black Forest Labs) if…

you want Free via third-party platforms on the free tier, plus Free via platforms for API tests.

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier(永久免费) for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, FLUX (Black Forest Labs) or Groq?

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does FLUX (Black Forest Labs) have a free tier?

Yes. FLUX (Black Forest Labs) lists Free via third-party platforms for free users.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) offers Free via platforms; Groq offers Free tier(永久免费). Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug
flux-vs-groq
FLUX (Black Forest Labs) source
https://blackforestlabs.ai
Groq source
https://groq.com
Dataset freshness
FLUX (Black Forest Labs): 2026-06-15 · Groq: 2026-06-15
Decision data
Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

🎁 Free Resource Pack

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit

Free API credits list, AI business case studies, payment stack, risk checklist, and a monetization roadmap.

Get it free →
🐑 AI Assistant