Free AI platform comparison

Groq vs Kimi (Moonshot AI): Complete Comparison

Groq 和 Kimi (月之暗面) 深度对比：免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、中国大陆可用性，帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

Groq vs Kimi (Moonshot AI): Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose Groq if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Kimi (Moonshot AI) if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierGroq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) · Kimi (Moonshot AI): No explicit limit

Free APIFree tier（永久免费） vs ¥15 + 充 $5 送 $5

Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction

DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters

Groq detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Kimi (Moonshot AI) detailsFree tier, API credits, limits and setup Free AI API directoryCompare all free credits and limits

👑

Groq

80pts

1 wins

Kimi (Moonshot AI)

65pts

0 wins

🏆 Overall, Groq offers more free value (1/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

Groq6 models

Llama 3.3 70B Versatile

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated

Llama 4 Scout 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use

Llama 4 Maverick 17B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use

Mixtral 8x7B

📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM

MoE architecture, cost-effective

Gemma 2 9B

📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM

Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM

DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning

Kimi (Moonshot AI)2 models

Kimi-K2.5

📐 1000k⚡ Fair use

Latest MoE model, 1M context, major coding/reasoning upgrade

Kimi-K2

📐 200k⚡ Fair use

Ultra-long context, supports file parsing

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier（永久免费） for API tests.

Choose Kimi (Moonshot AI) if…

you want No explicit limit on the free tier, plus ¥15 + 充 $5 送 $5 for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, Groq or Kimi (Moonshot AI)?

Groq scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Does Kimi (Moonshot AI) have a free tier?

Yes. Kimi (Moonshot AI) lists No explicit limit for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

Groq offers Free tier（永久免费）; Kimi (Moonshot AI) offers ¥15 + 充 $5 送 $5. Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug: groq-vs-kimi
Groq source: https://groq.com
Kimi (Moonshot AI) source: https://kimi.moonshot.cn
Dataset freshness: Groq: 2026-06-15 · Kimi (Moonshot AI): 2026-06-15
Decision data: Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

View Groq →View Kimi (Moonshot AI) →

Groq vs Kimi (Moonshot AI): Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Groq

Kimi (Moonshot AI)

📊 Side-by-Side

🧠 Model Details

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Groq if…

Choose Kimi (Moonshot AI) if…

FAQ

Source snapshot

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit