Free AI platform comparison

Groq vs Qwen (Alibaba): Complete Comparison

Groq 和 通义千问 (阿里) 深度对比:免费额度、API 价格、模型能力、国内可用性,帮你选最合适的 AI 工具

Quick decision

Groq vs Qwen (Alibaba): Complete Comparison: pricing, free API, and limits

Quick answer: choose Groq if its free tier, model family, or ecosystem fits your app better; choose Qwen (Alibaba) if it gives better free API credits, pricing, or access for your workflow. This comparison focuses on free tier, API pricing, limits, setup, and practical alternatives.

Free tierGroq: 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) · Qwen (Alibaba): 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model
Free APIFree tier(永久免费) vs 7000 万 tokens(新用户一次性;DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准)
Best checkCredits, rate limits, setup friction
DecisionTest both if rank, latency, or access matters
Groq

Groq

80pts
1 wins
VS
👑Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen (Alibaba)

95pts
2 wins

🏆 Overall, Qwen (Alibaba) offers more free value (2/6 categories)

📊 Side-by-Side

Category
Groq
Qwen (Alibaba)
Free Tier
✅ 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B)
✅ 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model
Free API
✅ Free tier(永久免费)
✅ 7000 万 tokens(新用户一次性;DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准)
Rate Limit
30 RPM / 6000 TPM
按模型和账号层级不同(RPM/TPM/并发以控制台为准)
Open Source
❌ No
✅ Yes
Free Models
6
4
GitHub Stars
-
⭐ 27,194

🧠 Model Details

Groq6 models
Llama 3.3 70B Versatile
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
World's fastest inference, 6000 tokens/min free, LPU chip accelerated
Llama 4 Scout 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Scout, MoE architecture, free to use
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
Meta Llama 4 Maverick, MoE architecture, free to use
Mixtral 8x7B
📐 32k⚡ 30 RPM / 5000 TPM
MoE architecture, cost-effective
Gemma 2 9B
📐 8k⚡ 30 RPM / 15000 TPM
Google Gemma 2, ultra-fast small model
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
📐 128k⚡ 30 RPM / 6000 TPM
DeepSeek R1 distilled, strong reasoning
Qwen (Alibaba)4 models
Qwen3.6-Plus
📐 1000k⚡ Quota and RPM/TPM vary by account
Latest flagship, strong long-context/coding model; verify free-credit coverage, RPM, TPM, and availability in the DashScope console
Qwen3.6-27B
📐 262k (1M extended)⚡ Local/open-source or hosted quota
27B dense open model for local deployment; hosted API quota and free-credit coverage depend on the account tier
Qwen-Max
📐 32k⚡ Higher-cost paid model; quota varies
Alibaba general model; confirm free-credit coverage and output pricing before heavy use
Qwen-VL
📐 32k⚡ Multimodal quota varies
Multimodal model; image/OCR usage may consume different quota than text calls

🎯 Which should you choose?

Choose Groq if…

you want 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) on the free tier, plus Free tier(永久免费) for API tests.

Choose Qwen (Alibaba) if…

you want 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model on the free tier, plus 7000 万 tokens(新用户一次性;DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准) for API tests.

FAQ

Which is better, Groq or Qwen (Alibaba)?

Qwen (Alibaba) scores higher in this free-tier comparison because it wins more of the measured categories. Still, the best choice depends on your exact needs: free chat access, API credits, open-source models, or rate limits.

Does Groq have a free tier?

Yes. Groq lists 6000 tokens/min (Llama 3.3 70B) for free users.

Does Qwen (Alibaba) have a free tier?

Yes. Qwen (Alibaba) lists 70M signup tokens via Bailian; runtime/RPM/TPM limits vary by model for free users.

Which one is better for API experiments?

Groq offers Free tier(永久免费); Qwen (Alibaba) offers 7000 万 tokens(新用户一次性;DashScope/Bailian 控制台为准). Choose the option with enough credits and rate limits for your prototype.

Source snapshot

Data source: yangmao.ai provider YAML tracker plus curated comparison notes. Official dashboards can change credits, limits, model availability, and pricing without notice; verify in the provider console before production.

yangmao.ai comparison slug
groq-vs-qwen
Groq source
https://groq.com
Qwen (Alibaba) source
https://tongyi.aliyun.com
Dataset freshness
Groq: 2026-06-05 · Qwen (Alibaba): 2026-06-05
Decision data
Free tier, API credits, rate limits, model list, China access notes, and curated comparison dimensions from the yangmao.ai provider tracker.

Need one fallback key after this comparison?

Use the provider guides for first-party testing, then route production traffic through one OpenAI-compatible key when multi-provider fallback, budget control, or China-access testing becomes painful.

Get an OpenLLMAPI key →

🎁 Free Resource Pack

Get the Free AI Startup Toolkit

Free API credits list, AI business case studies, payment stack, risk checklist, and a monetization roadmap.

Get it free →
🐑 AI Assistant